Former Irish President ‘seriously mistaken’ on infant baptism

Former Irish President Mary McAleese

Former Irish President, Dr Mary McAleese’s criticised infant baptism which she said imposed lifelong obligations of obedience to the Church’s magisterium A prominent Irish theologian has said former president is “seriously mistaken” in her views on infant baptism.

Fr Vincent Twomey is professor emeritus of moral theology at St Patrick’s College, Maynooth. He was responding to Dr McAleese’s criticism of infant baptism which she said imposed lifelong obligations of obedience to the Church’s magisterium on people as young as two weeks old.

Speaking to the Irish Times, the canon lawyer who has challenged the Vatican over its treatment of women and LGBT people, said early baptism breaches fundamental human rights.

“You can’t impose, really, obligations on people who are only two weeks old and you can’t say to them at seven or eight or 14 or 19 ‘here is what you contracted, here is what you signed up to’ because the truth is they didn’t.”

However, Fr Vincent Twomey responded to her comments stating, “Mrs McAleese is seriously mistaken, if she thinks that baptism is about human rights rather than divine grace,” he told The Tablet.

The former head of state has addressed the issue of infant baptism in her doctoral thesis in canon law which she is waiting to defend before an academic panel. She believes infant baptism results in enforced membership of the church and argues this is in breach of fundamental rights.

She told the Irish Times, “… there has to be a point at which our young people, as adults who have been baptised into the church and raised in the faith, have the chance to say, ‘I validate this’ or ‘I repudiate this’.”

“We live now in times where we have the right to freedom of conscience, freedom of belief, freedom of opinion, freedom of religion and freedom to change religion. The Catholic Church yet has to fully embrace that thinking,” she said

On the role of conscience where a Catholic is concerned, she said, “I think it’s very simple. My human right to inform my own conscience, my human right to express my conscience even if it is the case that it contradicts the magisterium, that right to conscience is supreme.”